Join Our Mailing List

What We Do
Preventive Program
Adult Education and Literacy
Youth Program
Legal Services Program
Health Program
Anti-Violence Program
Khalil Gibran International Academy
I Need To Be Heard!

Program Contact Information

Danny Salim
Anti-Violence Program Manager
(718) 250 - 5122


By A. Abbas. Florida State University. 2018.

Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 TEST 3 What is the sensitivity and specificity of reagent Systematic reviews generic prinivil 2.5 mg with visa, Medline 1966–2008 strips for detecting protein and blood in the urine of RCTs discount 2.5mg prinivil amex, observational Embase 1980–2008 patients? Does this change with age generic 2.5 mg prinivil mastercard, RCTs discount prinivil 2.5 mg otc, observational Embase 1980–2008 gender generic prinivil 2.5 mg without a prescription, ethnicity or presence/absence of studies Cochrane 1800–2008 proteinuria? Cinahl 1982–2008 IDEN 1 In adults, who should be tested for CKD? Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 RCTs, observational Embase 1980–2008 studies Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 PROG 1 What constitutes a significant decline in GFR? Cinahl 1982–2008 HYPR 1 What are the most appropriate antihypertensive Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 drugs to reduce the risk of progression of CKD and RCTs Embase 1980–2008 to decrease mortality in adults with CKD? Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 MONIT 1 In adults with CKD commencing an ACE inhibitor or Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 ARB, what parameters of renal function should be RCTs, observational Embase 1980–2008 monitored and how often? RISK 1 In adults with CKD does the risk:benefit ratio of ACE Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 inhibitors or ARBs change with increasing age? RCTs, observational Embase 1980–2008 studies Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 HYPR 2 In adults with proteinuric or non-proteinuric CKD, Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 does treatment with a) spironolactone alone, RCTs Embase 1980–2008 b) combinations of spironolactone and ACE inhibitors, Cochrane 1800–2008 c) combinations of spironolactone and ARBs, or Cinahl 1982–2008 d) combinations of spironolactone and ACE inhibitors and ARBs decrease mortality and reduce the risk of progression of CKD compared with placebo or other antihypertensive agents? Cinahl 1982–2008 LIPID 1 In adults with CKD and dyslipidaemia, do lipid Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 lowering agents (statins, fibrates, fish oils) decrease RCTs Embase 1980–2008 cardiovascular disease risk and all cause mortality Cochrane 1800–2008 compared with placebo or each other? Cinahl 1982–2008 ANTI 1 In adults with CKD, does antiplatelet and Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 anticoagulant therapy reduce cardiovascular RCTs Embase 1980–2008 morbidity and mortality compared with placebo? Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 URIC 1 Does lowering uric acid with a) allopurinol Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 b) uricosuric agents (probenecid, sulfinpyrazone) RCTs Embase 1980–2008 c) rasburicase (urate oxidase), decrease morbidity Cochrane 1800–2008 and mortality in adults with CKD and hyperuricaemia? Cinahl 1982–2008 HAEM 1 What are the adverse outcomes associated with No filters, i. Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 BONE 1 When should serum calcium, vitamin D, phosphate Systematic reviews, Medline 1966–2008 and intact parathyroid hormone levels be routinely RCTs, observational Embase 1980–2008 measured in adults with CKD? RCTs Embase 1980–2008 Cochrane 1800–2008 Cinahl 1982–2008 EDUC 1 What information, education, and support are No filters, i. Cinahl 1982–2008 TOOLS 1 What tools for community management are needed No filters, i. This follows referral of the topic by the Department of Health. The guideline will provide recommendations for good practice that are based on the best available evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. The statements in each NSF reflect the evidence that was used at the time the Framework was prepared. The clinical guidelines and technology appraisals published by the Institute after an NSF has been issued will have the effect of updating the Framework. The NSF for Renal Services (2005) is of particular relevance to this guideline. In an important minority of people, CKD will develop into established renal failure (ERF), necessitating treatment by dialysis and/or a kidney transplant (collectively known as renal replacement therapy, RRT) for continued survival. For a small minority of people with 4 Appendix B: Scope of the guideline significant associated comorbidity conservative management (i. Regular testing of high-risk groups (people with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease or known kidney disease, and the elderly) can give an early indication of renal damage, thus allowing the delivery of interventions at an early stage. However, the diagnosis is often delayed or missed due to a lack of specific symptoms until CKD is at an advanced stage. Factors associated with progression of CKD and with increased cardiovascular risk are similar and targeting of these risk factors may both reduce CVD in people with CKD and reduce progression of CKD to end stage renal failure. Since 2000, there has been a 22% increase in the number of people receiving RRT (an average increase of 4. Despite a wealth of literature detailing the increased hospitalisation, cost and mortality associated with late referral of people with advanced CKD to a nephrology service, late referral from both primary and secondary care is still at least as high as 30%. Late referral also precludes adequate assessment and preparation of those for whom conservative management is more appropriate. Significant costs and poor clinical outcomes are associated with the late referral of people with ERF needing RRT. Therefore, identification of people at earlier stages of CKD, appropriate management and earlier referral of those who would benefit from specialist renal services would lead to an increase in both economic and clinical effectiveness.

purchase prinivil 10 mg with mastercard

In addition buy 10mg prinivil otc, therapists described coming to the decision that 2.5 mg prinivil mastercard, for a particular child order 10 mg prinivil free shipping, existing evidence was not relevant or meaningful: buy cheap prinivil 10mg on-line. C1 Participants often reported looking to outputs from national professional bodies discount prinivil 5mg mastercard, or NICE, that summarised evidence and considered its implications. C1 We further discuss views on the perceived state of evidence in Chapter 8. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals 33 provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Experiences of physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and speech and language therapy were represented. Occupational therapy was typically mentioned as a service with which they had periodic contact. Physiotherapy and speech and language therapy were more likely to be spoken about as therapies for which their child had an enduring need. Clarity around the objectives of therapy interventions Parents commonly expressed that they had no knowledge or understanding of the decision process and rationale behind the therapy that their child was being offered. Furthermore, many parents reported being unclear about the aims, or goals, of the therapy being provided, and how progress towards those goals would be monitored, reviewed and, if necessary, the goals revised or updated. Those more likely to be content were those with younger, preschool children. There was general agreement among parents that their children did not get enough therapy. Although such statements were usually followed by a caveat expressing a belief that therapy services were significantly under-resourced, some parents noted that restricting access to therapy was short-sighted as it may lead to greater levels of dependency and/or more expensive treatments being required. The example provided was preventing contractures through physiotherapy, rather than managing them through surgery. Parents reported experiences, or an awareness, of geographical differences in therapy access. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals 35 provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Overall, there was confusion about how decisions were made about the acceptance of referrals and the resources allocated to a case. Concern was expressed for those children whose parents were not able to pursue issues of perceived deficiencies in care. Models of provision: ongoing versus episodic care Some parents reported experiences of repeated cycles of time-limited provision, discharge and re-referral. Parents consistently favoured arrangements that allowed ongoing access to therapy support, ideally from the same therapist. When parents felt that their child did not need continual input, open discharge arrangements (i. The key difficulty parents identified with episodic care was the lack of continuity of care. For example, one parent reported that her child had been seen by 12 occupational therapists. Another mentioned that seven physiotherapists had been involved with her child. This lack of continuity was viewed as problematic for two reasons. Second, some parents believed that it led to therapists having an incomplete understanding of conditions or diagnoses, in particular that the conditions are lifelong with changing needs. Integrated care A dominant theme in our conversations with parents was the integration of provision from the three therapies. The majority reported that they did not experience this.

prinivil 5 mg visa

Eight of 9 patients (89%) receiving verapamil pretreatment maintained sinus rhythm at 1 week compared with 6 of 14 patients (43%) not receiving verapamil pretreatment (p=0 generic 5mg prinivil with visa. There was significant benefit for patients given verapamil or metoprolol pretreatment (moderate strength of evidence) prinivil 5 mg visa. In this study 3 percent of patients with verapamil pretreatment compared with 11 percent without verapamil pretreatment had recurrent AF within 1 week following cardioversion (p=0 buy prinivil 5 mg visa. Results in Specific Subgroups of Interest As described above discount 5 mg prinivil overnight delivery, three of the four studies included patients with only persistent AF buy prinivil 10mg on-line. As with the overall results, no definitive conclusions can be drawn for this subgroup of interest because of the small number of patients and different drug treatments used in the studies. Other specific subgroups of interest were not explored within the included studies. Comparison of Drugs for Pharmacologic Cardioversion Overview Seventeen studies including 2,455 patients compared 2 or more rate- or rhythm-control drugs 140,144,145,147,149,170,177,180,181,188-193,204,206 and assessed conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Six studies 145,147,180,189,190,206 140,144,149,170,177,188,191-193 were multicenter, nine were single-center, and in two the 181,204 number of sites was not reported. Twelve studies were conducted in 140,144,145,147,170,177,188,191-193,204,206 149,190 181 Europe, two in Australia/New Zealand, one in the UK, 180,189 140,170,177,180,181 and two in the United States. Five studies were of good quality, 11 of fair 144,145,147,149,188-193,204 206 quality, and 1 of poor quality. Three studies were conducted in an 140,144,177 147,180,192 inpatient setting, three in an outpatient setting, four in the emergency 149,170,189,190 188 room, one in multiple settings, and in six the setting was not 145,181,191,193,204,206 145,180 reported. Two studies received industry funding, 1 received government 180 145,149,177,189 funding, 4 were funded by nongovernment, nonindustry sources, and 12 did not 140,144,147,170,181,188,190-193,204,206 report funding source. Nine studies included only patients with 144,145,147,170,177,192,193,204,206 189 persistent AF, and one included only patients with paroxysmal AF. Only seven of the studies included a comparison between two or more antiarrhythmic drugs 149,170,177,180,181,190,191 (Table 11). The most common comparison was between amiodarone and sotalol (four studies). Amiodarone was compared with ibutilide in one study and with flecainide and propafenone in one study, and ibutilide was compared with propafenone plus ibutilide in one 170,180 181 study. Three of the studies included placebo or control arms which were not included in our analyses. Two of these studies also included an additional intervention arm that evaluated the 149,190 use of digoxin. In four studies, electrical cardioversion was not part of the study protocol, while in the remaining three the effect of the drugs was evaluated before and after external electrical cardioversion. Restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed prior to electrical 149 cardioversion within 12 hours of drug administration in 1 of these 3 studies, within 28 days in 180 181 the second study, and within 6 weeks of drug initiation in the third. In the studies without use of electrical cardioversion, restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed at 48 hours in one study and within 24 hours in the other three studies. In addition, one study assessed recurrence of AF 177 within 24 hours. Two of the studies were conducted primarily in an emergency room 149,170 177,191 180,181,190 setting, two in an inpatient setting, and three in an outpatient setting. Studies including comparisons between antiarrhythmic drugs Study Sample Arm 1 Arm 2 Arm 3 Timing of Assessment Size (N) Outcome of Conversion Assessment Post-DCC? Prior to or Without DCC Thomas, 140 Amiodarone Sotalol (IV Digoxin (IV Within 12 Yes 149 2004 (IV then oral) then oral) then oral) hours a Vijayalakshmi, 94 Amiodarone Sotalol (oral) Control Within 6 weeks Yes 181 2006 (oral) 180 Singh, 2005 665 Amiodarone Sotalol (oral) - 28 days Yes (oral) 190 Joseph, 2000 115 Amiodarone Sotalol (IV Digoxin (IV 48 hours No (IV then oral) then oral) then oral) 170 Balla, 2011 160 Amiodarone Flecainide Propafenone Within 24 No (oral) (oral) (oral) hours 191 Kafkas, 2007 152 Amiodarone Ibutilide (IV) - Within 24 No (IV) hours Korantzopoulos, 100 Ibutilide (IV) Propafenone - Within 24 No 177 2006 (oral) + hours ibutilide (IV) Also assessed recurrence within 24 hours post- conversion aNot included in analyses. Abbreviations: DCC=direct current cardioversion In 8 studies (including 2 from Table 11), an antiarrhythmic drug (amiodarone, sotalol, or ibutilide) was compared with a rate-controlling drug (digoxin, diltiazem, carvedilol, or esmolol). Among these, restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed both before and after electrical 144,149,204 cardioversion in three studies. In the remaining five studies, external electrical 140,188,190,192,193 cardioversion was not part of the study protocol. In those studies, restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed from 30 minutes to 48 hours following drug initiation. In addition, 1 of the studies reported recurrence of AF within 24 hours of drug treatment and electrical 144 cardioversion. In four studies, rate-controlling drugs were used in both study arms, and the study assessed restoration of sinus rhythm. In three of these, restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed before 145,147,206 and after electrical cardioversion.

safe prinivil 10 mg

Reinforcing and neurochemical effects logic basis of memory purchase 2.5mg prinivil with amex, second ed cheap 10mg prinivil mastercard. New York: Academic Press discount prinivil 10mg overnight delivery, of cocaine: differences among C57 buy 2.5mg prinivil, DBA and 129 mice generic 10mg prinivil otc. The reinforcing and 1396 Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose-response individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Discriminative stimulus effects of opioids the rewarding effects of the specific dopamine uptake inhibitor in pigeons trained to discriminate fentanyl, bremazocine and GBR12783. Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the tion of cocaine self-administration with and without condi- rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Pharmacogenetics of responses to alcohol and genes that ethanol reward, but not ethanol aversion, in mice lacking 5- influence alcohol drinking. Intra-amygdala muscimol de- effects on oral cocaine-reinforced behavior. J Exp Anal Behav creases operant ethanol self-administration in dependent rats. Excessive ethanol drinking noncontingent cocaine on drug-seeking behavior measured following a history of dependence: animal model of allostasis. Postcocaine anhedonia: an animal model an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Cocaine self- havior produced by heroin-predictive environmental stimuli. Rodriguez de Fonseca F, Carrera MRA, Navarro M, et al. Acti- injections of SCH23390 on intravenous cocaine self-adminis- vation of corticotropin-releasing factor in the limbic system dur- tration under both a fixed and progressive ratio schedule of ing cannabinoid withdrawal. Conditioned cued recovery of responding crose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. Alco- following prolonged withdrawal from self-administered cocaine hol Clin Exp Res 1986;10:436–442. Motivational conse- under concurrent signalled differential-reinforcement-of-low- quences of naloxone-precipitated opiate withdrawal: A dose- rates schedules. Decreased brain reward mance maintained by buprenorphine, heroin and methadone produced by ethanol withdrawal. Relative sensitivity to pies for treatment of cocaine and opioid abuse using drug self- naloxone of multiple indices of opiate withdrawal: A quantita- administration procedures. The conditioned reinforcing effects strain of rat, stimulus intensity, and intrinsic efficacy at the mu of stimuli associated with morphine reinforcement. The importance of a opioid receptor agonists studies with place and taste preference compound stimulus in conditioned drug-seeking behavior fol- conditioning. Sensitization to the condi- ety Neurosci Abstr 1999;25:1574. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical review. Naltrexone and coping administration in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994; skills therapy for alcohol dependence: a controlled study. Conditioned stimulus control of the expression of 71. Factors that predict sensitization of the behavioral activating effects of opiate and Chapter 97: Recent Advances in Animal Models of Drug Addiction 1397 stimulant drugs. Control of ing and memory: the behavioral and biological substrates. Hills- cocaine-seeking behavior by drug-associated stimuli in rats: ef- dale, NJ: LEA, 1992:129–151. Tolerance and sensitization to the behav- cellular dopamine levels in amygdala and nucleus accumbens. Measures of cocaine- cer in normal weight rhesus monkeys: dose-response functions.

9 of 10 - Review by A. Abbas
Votes: 272 votes
Total customer reviews: 272


The Arab-American Family Support Center is a 501(c)3 non-profit, non-sectarian organization that provides culturally and linguistically sensitive services to immigrant communities throughout New York City.  © 2017 All Rights Reserved.

AAFSC Brooklyn
150 Court Street, 3rd Flr
Brooklyn, NY 11201
T: 718 - 643 - 8000
F: 718 - 797 - 0410
E: info@aafscny.org
AAFSC Queens
37-10 30th Street, 2nd Fl.

Queens, NY 11101
T: 718 - 937 - 8000
F: 347 - 808 - 8778
AAFSC @ the Family Justice Centers
FJC Bronx (718) 508-1220
FJC Brooklyn (718) 250 - 5035
FJC Manhattan (212) 602-2800
FJC Queens (718) 575 - 4500
FJC Staten Island (718) 697 - 4300